Illegal Protest

Tuesday, August 5th will be a day to celebrate - it’s the day Jose Medellin will meet his much deserved end in Texas.

The Associated Press describes Mr Medellin in this way:

“Medellin was convicted in the June 1993 torture, rape and strangling of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14. The Houston girls, whose bodies were found four days after they failed to return from a friend’s house, had been attacked as they took a shortcut along some railroad tracks and stumbled on a group drinking beer after initiating a new gang member. Evidence showed the girls were gang raped for more than an hour, then were kicked and beaten before being strangled by a belt or shoelaces.”

If you aren’t familiar with the case, our illustrious pro-Mexico Presidente GW Bush tried to get the World Court to intervene and spare the life of this hard working immigrant. But thank goodness Texas said kiss my ass and Medellin is going right to where he belongs this Tuesday. I think I’ll have to buy some champagne!

Amazingly, Mexico is THREATENING us with “anti-US” sentiment warnings regarding this execution? Really? Mexicans might actually trash the US? You mean more than they already are? You mean they might actually be disrespectful of Miss USA or something? Or.. they might burn the American flag?

Here’s the article with the “THREAT” from Mexico:

MEXICO CITY — The U.S. embassy in Mexico is warning Americans of possible protests next week when a Mexican man is scheduled to be executed in Texas.

In a public statement the embassy says it has received information that protests may occur next Tuesday, when Jose Medellin is scheduled to die. It urged Americans to avoid the protests.

The embassy says activists in Mexico could use the demonstrations “to incite anti-U.S. sentiment in general.”

The Friday statement noted that even peaceful demonstrations “can turn confrontational and possibly escalate into violence.”

Medellin has been sentenced to die for his participation in the 1993 gang rape and beating deaths of two Houston girls aged 14 and 16.

I say to Mexico BRING IT ON.

Oh my God… an image search for Jose Medellin actually found a web site where apparently Jose Medellin is SEARCHING FOR ROMANCE. It was found in German and translated with the help of Google. YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME. He forgot to list among his interests - rape, sodomy and murder.. gee he somehow left those out! Go figure!

Here’s his LAME PICTURE on the German dating site:

Hi - I like to rape, sodomize and murder teenagers.. please date me!

Oh and here’s ANOTHER cute little letter from murderer Jose Medellin whilst looking for love.. how sweet. Better hurry up cuz he’s about to be very hard to reach!

*************

Update!

Apparently there is new legislation just introduced on July 15th that would have prevented the much-deserved execution of Jose Medellin. It is sponsored by these two dirtbags - Zoe Lofgren and Howard Berman - both California Democrats who fully support the illegal alien invasion. Here is a link to the legislation dubbed H.R. 6481

In a nutshell, this legislation is saying that these illegal alien murderers can be protected by their country’s consulate from being executed for crimes for which they are convicted. This is an onerous and obnoxious interference in sovereign government by the Vienna Convention. Call your representative this week and object to this legislation!!!!! It has currently been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.. stop it now before it gets any farther!

Text of the HR 6481:

To create a civil action to provide judicial remedies to carry out certain treaty obligations of the United States under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Avena Case Implementation Act of 2008’.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REMEDY.

• (1) any declaratory or equitable relief necessary to secure the rights; and

  (2) in any case where the plaintiff is convicted of a criminal offense where the violation occurs during and in relation to the investigation or prosecution of that offense, any relief required to remedy the harm done by the violation, including the vitiation of the conviction or sentence where appropriate.

(a) Civil Action- Any person whose rights are infringed by a violation by any nonforeign governmental authority of article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations may in a civil action obtain appropriate relief.

(b) Nature of Relief- Appropriate relief for the purposes of this section means–

(c) Application- This Act applies with respect to violations occurring before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Wow there is actually a judge left who has some common sense and is not completely on the side of open borders globalists? Patriotic Americans everywhere should celebrate this victory! It shines a harsh light on those who sought to squelch the free speech and rights of the San Diego Minutemen as well as shows that their efforts to brand the SDMM as “racists” has failed miserably.. because.. well.. there is NO PROOF. You cannot just make claims like that without facts and proof and I hope SDMM takes Caltrans to the CLEANERS and then puts that money to good use in taking back this country for AMERICANS!

Caltrans officials are reviewing a federal judge’s decision ordering it to reinstate an Adopt-A-Highway permit for the San Diego Minutemen to conduct highway shoulder cleanups on Interstate 5 next to the Border Patrol’s San Clemente checkpoint.

Meanwhile, the anti-illegal immigration activists, who sued the transportation agency alleging free-speech discrimination in February over the removal of their Adopt-A-Highway sign and their reassignment to another location, are awaiting permission to schedule cleanups along the two-mile stretch of northbound I-5 it had adopted.

“We can’t do a cleanup unless we have a permit to encroach upon the freeway,” said Howard Kaloogian, the group’s attorney. “There has to be a permit issued and a sign acknowledging the permit.”

Caltrans has 30 days to restore the sign. Meanwhile, the activists are celebrating their court victory as they wait.

“We were hoping that the fight would be worth it,” said Jeff Schwilk, the group’s leader. “It really comes down to free speech. We’re thrilled.”

The San Diego Minutemen were granted the stretch of I-5 by Caltrans in November, after first applying for a spot on state Route 78, which was taken. After being assigned the spot by the immigration checkpoint – a coincidence, according to Caltrans – Schwilk sent out messages to members about their luck.

“How great is that?!” Schwilk wrote in one e-mail.

The proximity to the checkpoint was disturbing to local Latino groups and some state legislators, who criticized Caltrans for granting the permit. According to Caltrans guidelines, the program bars groups that advocate “discrimination based upon race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry,” among other things; the group has maintained that it does not discriminate.

Citing safety concerns that might arise if the group were targeted by opponents, Caltrans reassigned the activists to a stretch of state Route 52 near Santee, which they refused to take.

Yesterday, local critics of the San Diego Minutemen said they were disappointed by the ruling, which the judge issued last week.

“Although I understand it, we remain with the opinion that the Minuteman organization is using the Adopt-A-Highway program as a method of advertising their extremist agenda,” said Bill Flores, a retired San Diego County assistant sheriff who is now a spokesman for El Grupo, a North County coalition that includes local chapters of the League of United Latin American Citizens, the NAACP and others.

Hey idiot! What exactly is EXTREMIST about wanting our country to NOT BE INVADED BY FOREIGNERS WHO COME HERE ILLEGALLY? You want to see EXTREMIST take a nice look at the Reconquistas in Los Angeles and the racists politicians who are promoting the “Latino agenda” to the exclusion of ALL OTHER RACES EXCEPT LATINOS. That is what I call EXTREMIST.

Kaloogian said yesterday that while the group is pleased with the ruling, a preliminary injunction in the First Amendment case, it will pursue the lawsuit, which seeks monetary damages.
“The preliminary injunction having been issued is a very good sign for us,” he said.

Full article at SignOnSanDiego  (you can comment there)

Here is what I have to say about this. The most important point to realize here and to expose the blatant lies and finger pointing of the pro-illegals in this situation, is that CALTRANS WAS THE ONE WHO GAVE I-5 TO THE SDMM. They did not campaign for that stretch of highway. It was just a stroke of pure luck. So how in the WORLD can that be using that stretch of highway to further “their extremist agenda” WHEN IT WASN’T EVEN THEIR IDEA?????

Good news for all Pennsylvania residents…. I wonder if Reading, Norristown and Philadelphia will get the memo that their days as “sanctuary cities” are numbered? I urge you to call your PA rep and tell them you support the entire legislation package sponsored by Daryl Metcalfe… It’s ALL good as they say and is a BIG step in the right direction for Pennsylvania.

I live near Norristown and it makes me SICK to see an entire section of the “West End” turned into a Little Mexico. The sign at the bottom of the strip says “Historic Shopping District” but it should say “Historic Puebla Mexico” instead. Several blocks of West Marshall Street are now exclusively Mexican restaurants, Mexican bodegas and even their own little indoor Mall called La Plazita.. A big real estate guy in the area even advertises his rentals IN SPANISH in that area. What is wrong with this picture???? Norristown USED to be Germans and Italians for the most part. Now it is almost 35% Mexican!!! And we are more than 2000 miles from the southern border. If I wanted to live near a border town I’d move to Texas or Arizona for crying out loud.

I have approached the Norristown Town Council and the Montgomery County Commissioners. All of them have felt it is “not their yob” to solve the invasion of illegal aliens into Norristown. One particular councilman, Bill Procyson, makes the point that the Mexicans are “nice” and why should it be his problem to pick out who is here illegally? My point - we shouldn’t have to wonder at all - that is if our GOVERNMENT was DOING ITS JOB.

Now with this legislation package - people like Bill Procyson won’t get to say - “not my yob” and they will be forced to deal with the growing problem of an increasing TAX BURDEN without an increasing TAX BASE from the invasion of illegal aliens into our state and our towns.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!

_____________________________________________

News Advisory
Office of State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe
June 10, 2008 FOR INFORMATION: Ty McCauslin (717) 772-9979

State Lawmakers to Unveil “No Sanctuary” Legislation to Offset Increasing Taxpayer Costs Fueling PA’s Illegal Alien Invasion

WHAT: State Representatives Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler), Tom Creighton (R-Lancaster), Mark Mustio (R-Allegheny), Scott Perry (R-Cumberland/York) and Harry Readshaw (D-Allegheny) will introduce the newest additions to the National Security Begins at Home package.

Sponsored by Metcalfe, both pieces of legislation would provide legal and economic sanctions against any city, municipality or other local government entity that adopts ordinances, policies or informal procedures to encourage illegal aliens to reside within its borders or otherwise hinders law enforcement activities.

WHO: Offering support for this bipartisan legislation and providing insight on the ever-increasing social and taxpayer costs resulting from Pennsylvania’s ongoing Illegal Alien Invasion will be Kathleen Appell, research and media coordinator, Citizens for Immigration Control and Enforcement; Marianne Davies, Esq. vice-chair, You Don’t Speak for Me; and Yeh Ling-Ling, executive director Diversity Alliance for a Sustainable America.

Other state lawmakers scheduled to attend include: Reps. Jim Cox, (R-Berks), Rob Kauffman, (R-Cumberland/Franklin), Sam Rohrer (R-Berks) and RoseMarie Swanger (R-Lebanon).

DATE: Wednesday, June 11
TIME: 10 a.m.
WHERE: State Capitol Rotunda
LIVE WEBCAST: Log on to www.RepMetcalfe.com, www.RepCreighton.com, www.RepMustio.com or www.RepPerry.com beginning at 9:55 a.m. on Wednesday morning.

_______________________________________________

Last summer, Digger and I attended a press conference in Philadelphia with many of the people leading this charge. Read about it here on Digger’s Realm

Here is an excerpt from a 2003 article in The Times Herald which tried to answer the question - Why Norristown?

Puebla and Acapulco are the two largest sending cities, officials said. But nobody is sure who was first or why Norristown was chosen. Officials only have assumptions. The most widely accepted beliefs are:
1. Immigrants arrive in larger cities and towns such as Philadelphia and West Chester, naturally sprawling to Norristown.
2. Inexpensive housing in Norristown encourages immigrants to establish lives here, rather than more expensive surrounding townships.
3. The abundance of service jobs in landscaping, retail, restaurants and hotels creates a demand that immigrants supply. Mexican immigrants are most often single men working in these jobs six to nine months of the year, who return to Mexico for the rest of the year.
4. Once immigrants establish homes here, they send for their families and friends, and in turn, these families and friends tell more people, creating a domino effect.
5. Less than 500,000 immigrants each year stay in the country. Though it looks like many immigrants are here, what people mostly see are immigrants in the country using temporary visas.

The journey is not easy.

Some people have visas and other proper documentation to live in the United States, but about half of the Mexican population does not.

“It’s not easy to make that decision - to leave behind everything you know,” said Miguel Dones, president of Conecciones, a social services and economic organization serving the Norristown community.   Officials from the United States and Mexico agree that the reason for the great wave of immigration is money. “The opportunities are on this side of the border,” said Deputy Consul Jacob Prado of the Mexican Consulate of Philadelphia. “Nobody wants to leave their hometown or families. If they come here, it’s because economic opportunities are available in this country.”

There you have it. Remove the ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES for illegal aliens and they will not come here!

More on how the population of Norristown has changed from the same article:

Between 1990 and 2000, Norristown’s Hispanic population jumped nearly 400 percent, with most of the expansion within the last five years.

Nobody is exactly sure why thousands have chosen to live here, but Norristown has the largest population of Hispanics in Montgomery County.

While the Hispanic population increased by nearly 2,500 individuals, the total population of the borough only increased by 500 people.

This means at least 2,000 non-Hispanics moved out of Norristown, while 2,000 Hispanics moved in.

In the early and mid 90’s, Puerto Ricans were the largest Hispanic minority in Norristown, but now Mexicans have taken over that distinction.

The entire reason for controlling immigration and enforcing immigration laws in ANY country is to prevent the cultural hijacking of any part of a country through large numbers of “immigrants” - legal or illegal - to a community. The reasoning behind immigration control is to PRESERVE the cultural identity of our towns and cities. But instead we have allowed the population of Norristown to be INVADED through a 400 PER CENT INCREASE in Hispanics - most of whom are here illegally. I hold the leaders of Norristown fully responsible for allowing this to happen and I whole heartedly support the efforts by Daryl Metcalfe and others at our state government level for leading the charge to turn this tide and reclaim Norristown and other places in Pennsylvania for the native population.

Hoo Ha.. Who woulda thunk it? Clearing out illegal aliens in a state actually has a NET benefit! This should silence all of those people who say our economy might collapse withouth the labor of illegal aliens. Funny how an economy can rebound when you remove the PARASITES.

Full article on gopusa.com

Since Arizona’s local law enforcement began enforcing illegal immigration laws and an employer sanctions law went into effect, illegal immigrants have been fleeing the state in large numbers. The effects have been far-ranging. Commuters are reporting fewer vehicles on the freeways, shortening their rush-hour commutes. What had become a serious transportation problem in Arizona is losing its urgency. English Learner Language (ELL) students started dropping out of school. This helped end a confrontation between the state legislature and a liberal federal judge who had ordered the state to spend more money on ELL classes.

Fewer illegal immigrants are using hospital emergency rooms, so waiting times have decreased. Although the rest of the country is in an economic slump, unemployment is going down in Arizona, from 4.5% in January to 4.1% in March. Day laborers loitering outside of Home Depot and other stores have mostly disappeared, ending months of confrontation between illegal immigrant sympathizers and protesters. Desert lands near the border are returning to their pristine condition and the wildlife is coming back. Identity theft and car thefts are decreasing. No one showed up on May 1 to march in immigrant rallies.

With illegal immigrants leaving, the state will see huge savings as fewer illegal immigrants use social welfare programs and the cost of arresting, prosecuting, incarcerating and deporting them decreases. Arizona is facing one of the worst budget deficits ever, looming as high as $2 billion in 2009, but the situation may resolve itself.

It’s wonderful that we are getting to see this experiment in action so that the lies and propaganda being spread by the open borders zealots can be silenced for good. Arizona can become a shining example for the rest of the country. THIS is how you fix the problem of illegal immigration!

Tipped by Dr. Gayle Kesselman of the New Jersey Citizens for Immigration Control